You are here: Home>JBAR Journal>Archive>17020114>14v20105.html

---

Growth and Yield of Boro Rice (BRRI Dhan 50) as Affected by Planting Geometry under System of Rice Intensification

Sudip Chakrabortty 1, P. K. Biswas 1, T. S. Roy 1, M.A.A. Mahmud2, H. Mehraj 3 and A. F. M. Jamal Uddin 3
Dept. of Agronomy, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka 1
Dept. of Animal Nutrition, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet 2
Dept. of Horticulture, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka, Bangladesh 3

Abstract
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is the staple crop in Bangladesh and different factors influence its productivity. Among these factors, desired number of plant spacing per unit area is important for higher yield attainment.Therefore, this study were undertaken to define the optimum plant geometry for getting the maximum yield. The experiment was conducted at Agronomy field, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University during December, 2011 to May, 2012 to study the growth and yield of Boro rice (BRRI dhan 50) as affected by planting geometry under System of Rice Intensification (SRI). Experiment comprised 5 level of plant spacing, viz. S1: 25 cm × 25 cm, S2: 30 cm × 30 cm, S3: 35 cm × 35 cm, S4: 40 cm × 40 cm and S5: 25 cm × 15 cm following Completely Randomized Block Design with three replication. Maximum dry matter (156.2 g/hill), number of tiller (44.0/hill), number of effective tiller (36.3/hill), number of filled grains (101.5/panicle), grain yield (6.9 t/ha), straw yield (5.9 t/ha), biological yield (12.7 t/ha) and harvest index (54.5%) was found from 40 x 40 cm plant spacing while minimum was observed from 25 x 25 cm of plant spacing in this study.

Key words: Oryza sativa, planting geometry, growth and yield

Growth and yield of boro rice (BRRI dhan 50) as affected by planting geometry under system of rice intensification.pdf
File Size:	246 kb
File Type:	pdf

Download File

---

---

Citation for this article (APA Style)
Chakrabortty, S., Biswas, P. K., Roy, T. S., Mahmud, M. A. A., Mehraj, H., & Uddin, A. F. M. J. (2014). Growth and Yield of Boro Rice (BRRI Dhan 50) as Affected by Planting Geometry Under System of Rice Intensification. Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research,02(01), 36-43.

References

1. Awan, T. H., Ahmad, M., Ali, R. A., Anwar, M. and Manzoor, Z. (2007).Contribution of different tillers with in a plant of super basmati to grain yield of rice. J. Agri. Res. 44(2): 237-243.
2. Awan, T. H., Manzoor, Z., Safdar, M. E. and Ahmad, M. (2006). Studies on the influence of primary, secondary and tertiary tillers on yield and yieldrelated traits in basmati-2000. Pakistan J. Sci. 59(1-2): 43-46.
3. Awan, T. H., Ali, R. I., Manzoor, Z. Ahmed, M. and Akhtar M. (2011). Effect of different nitrogen levels and row spacing on the performance of newly evolved medium grain rice variety, KSK-133. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 21(2): 231-234.
4. Balasubramaniyan, P. and Palaniappan, S. P. (1991). Effect of high density population and fertilizer rate on growth and yield of low land rice.Indian J. Agron. 36(1): 10-13.
5. Baloch, A. W., Soomro, A. M., Javed, M. A. and Ahmed, M. (2002). Optimum plant density for high yield in rice.Asian J. Plant Sci.1: 25–27
6. Banik, P., Sarkar, B., Basmal, T., Ghosal, P. K. and Bagohi, D. K. (1997). Effect of different numbers and age of seedlings on rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars in lowland plateau region of Bihar. Ind. J. Agron. 42: 265-268.
7. Bari, G., Mustafa, G., Soomro, A. M. and Baloch, A. W. (1984). Effect ofplant density on grain yield and yield components of differentvarieties and mutant strains of rice. Pak. J. Bot. 16: 169-174.
8. Batuwitage, G. (2000). System of Rice Cultivation (SRI). Ministry of Agriculture, Colombo, Srilanka. July, 2000.
9. Bozorgi, H. R., Faraji, A., Danesh, R. K., Keshavarz, A., Azarpour, E. and Tarighi, F. (2011). Effect of Plant Density on Yield and Yield Components of Rice. World Appl. Sci. J.12(11): 2053-2057.
10. BRRI (Bangladesh Rice Research Institute) (2012). Adhunik Dhaner Chash. Joydebpur, Dhaka. p.10.
11. Counce, P. A. 1987. Asymptotic and parabolic yield and linear nutrient content responses to rice population density. Agron. J. 79: 864-869.
12. Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. (1984). Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research (2nd edn.). Int. Rice Res. Inst., A Willey Int. Sci. pp.28-192.
13. Gozubenli, H. (2010). Influence of planting pattern and plant density on the performance of maize hybrids in the eastern Mediterranean condition. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 12: 556–560.
14. IRRI (International Rice Research Institute) (1997). Rice Production Manual, p: 95. UPLB, Los Banos, The Philippines.
15. Kandil, A. A., El-Kalla, S. E., Badawi, A. T. and El-Shayb, O. M. (2010). Effect of hill spacing, nitrogen levels and harvest date on rice productivity and grain quality. Crop Environ.1: 22–26.
16. Khan, M. B., Yasir, T. A. and Aman, M. (2005). Growth and yield comparison of different linseed genotypes planted at different row spacing. Int. J. Agric. Biol.7: 515–517.
17. Krishna, A., Biradarpatil, N. K., Manjappa, K. and Channappagoudar, B. B. (2008). Evaluation of System of Rice Intensification Cultivation, Seedling Age and Spacing on Seed Yield and Quality in Samba Masuhri (BPT-5204) Rice. Karnataka J. Agri. Sci.21(1): 20-25.
18. Lone, B. A., Badr-ul-Hassan, Ansar-ul-Haq, S. and Khan, M. H. (2010). Effect of seed rate, row spacing and fertility levels on relative economics of soybean (Glycine max L.) under temperate conditions.Afric. J. Agric. Res. 5: 322-324.
19. Miah, M. H. N., Karim, M. A., Rahman, M. S. and Islam, M. S. (1990). Performance of Nitrogen nutrients under different row spacing.Bangladesh J. Train. Dev. 3(2):31-34.
20. Mohaddesi, A., Abbasian, A., Bakhshipour, S. and Aminpanah, H. (2011).Effect of different levels of nitrogen and plant spacing on yield, yield components and physiological indices in high yield rice.Amer-Eur. J. Agric Environ.10: 893–900
21. Oad, F. C., Solangi, B. K., Samo, M. A., Lakho, A. A., Hassan, Z. U. and Oad, N. L. (2001). Growth, yield and relationship of rape seed under different row spacing. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 3: 475–476.
22. Rad, S. F., Mazaheri, D. and Banah, T. (1999). Effect of planting dates and plant density on yield and growth of cowpea line 29005. Seed and Plant 15(2): 84-89.​
23. Senanayake, N., De Datta, S. K., Naylor, R. E. L. and Thompson, W. J. (1991).Lowland rice apical development stages and cultivar differences detected by electron microscopy. Agron. J. 83: 1013-1023.
24. Shekari, K. (2001). The effect of planting date and density on yield and the parts of yield M.A degree Agronomy field, Islamic Azad university, Varamin branch , 98, p.
25. Singh, T. N., Singh, G. and Singh, H. P. (1983). Nitrogen fertilization and spacing to maximize upland rice yield. Int. Rice Res. Newsl. 86: 27.
26. Soratto, R. P. (2004). Nutrient exportation and grain quality of upland rice as influenced by plant density and row spacing. Seropedica, Brazil: Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ). Agronomia 36(1/2): 17-22.
27. Sridhara, C. J., Ramachandrappa, B. K., Kumarswamy, A. S. and Gurumurthy, K. T. (2011). Effect of genotypes, planting geometry and methods of establishment on root traits and yield of aerobic rice.Karnataka J. Agric. Sci. 24(2): 129-132.
28. Tohiduzzaman. (2011). Screening of rice varieties responsive to system of rice intensification (sri) in boro season. M. Sc. (Ag) Thesis. Dept. of Agronomy.Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
29. Veeramani, P. (2011). Enhancement of Mat Nursery management and planting pattern (using rolling markers) in System of Rice Intensification (SRI) Technique. Res. J. Agril. Sci. 2(2): 371-375.
30. Vijayakumar, M., singh, S. D. S., Prabhakaran, N. K. and Thiyagarajan, T. M. (2004). Effect of SRI practices on the yield attributes, yield and water productivity of rice. Acta Agron. 52: 399-408.
31. Wang, G. S. and Luo, H. M. (1998). Relationship between sowing density and sowing norm of rice varieties with different kilograin weight. Res. Agric. Mod. 19: 40-43. Yoshida, S. (1981). Fundamentals of Rice Crop Science, IRRI, Philipines. pp. 1-41.