Asian Journal of Crop, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
You are here: Home>AJCSP Journal>AJCSP Archive>Article Page: ajcsp-010119-02.html
Asian J. Crop. Soil Plan. Nutri. | Volume 01, Issue 01, 07-14 | https://doi.org/10.18801/ajcsp.010119.02
Article type: Research article | Article received: 13.02.19; Revised: 24.04.19; First published online: 25 May 2019.
Article type: Research article | Article received: 13.02.19; Revised: 24.04.19; First published online: 25 May 2019.
Cost of production and cost benefit analysis of different rice in Sirajganj district
Sontosh Chandra Chanda 1, Md. Arshed Ali 2, Md. Eakramul Haque 3, Md. Rishad Abdullah 1 and A.K.M. Golam Sarwar 1
1 Laboratory of Plant Systematics, Department of Crop Botany, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202
2 Additional Director, Department of Agriculture Extension, Khamarbari, Bogura Region, Bogura
3 Scientific Officer, On Farm Research Division, ARS, BARI, Rangpur-5400, Bangladesh.
Article correspondence: sontoshchanda@gmail.com (Chanda, S. C.).
1 Laboratory of Plant Systematics, Department of Crop Botany, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202
2 Additional Director, Department of Agriculture Extension, Khamarbari, Bogura Region, Bogura
3 Scientific Officer, On Farm Research Division, ARS, BARI, Rangpur-5400, Bangladesh.
Article correspondence: sontoshchanda@gmail.com (Chanda, S. C.).
Abstract
Appropriate agricultural practices have positive and sustainable impacts on rural farmers’ livelihood possessions and strategies to overcome the climate vulnerabilities. The benefit cost ratio (BCR) is a relative measure which is used to determine benefit per unit cost and helps farmers in decision making activities. A study was carried out in the Sirajganj district during 2017, to compare the cost and revenue of Aus, Aman and Boro rice, using benefit cost ratio technique. The Sirajganj district consists of nine upzilas. Ten farmers of each upzila were randomly selected and primary data were personally collected from the respondents through structural questionnaire. The data about Aus, Aman and Boro rice and their cost as well as returns were collected in farmers’ field. The collected data were then sorted, scrutinized and analyzed to achieve the goal set for the study. Results revealed that the total cost of production in Aus rice varied 40856-71353 Tk./ha, gross returns 90651-123889 Tk./ha, cost of per kilogram rice production was 9.87 – 15.45 Tk./kg and BCR 1.61-2.22. The total cost of Aman (Local) rice varied 43031-69067 Tk./ha, gross returns 57651-86889 Tk./ha, cost of per kilogram rice production was 14.98 - 21.40 Tk./kg and BCR 1.25-1.65. The total cost of Aman (HYV) rice varied 66111-78724 Tk./ha, gross returns 123321-164439 Tk./ha, cost of per kilogram rice production was 9.87-14.45 Tk./kg and BCR 1.70-2.22. The total cost of Boro (HYV) rice varied 89129-96886 Tk./ha, gross returns 164439-208956 Tk./ha, cost of per kilogram rice production was 9.31-13.84 Tk./kg and BCR 1.90-2.31. The total cost of Boro (Hybrid) rice varied 92868-99684 Tk./ha, gross returns 205524-226083 Tk./ha, cost of per kilogram rice production 8.99-10.74 Tk./kg and BCR 2.10-2.36. Aus/Aman rice cultivation is eco-friendly i.e., needs less ground water, lower risk of early floods and hailstorms, etc.
Key Words: Aus rice, Aman rice, Boro rice, Cost, Return and Benefit cost-ratio.
Appropriate agricultural practices have positive and sustainable impacts on rural farmers’ livelihood possessions and strategies to overcome the climate vulnerabilities. The benefit cost ratio (BCR) is a relative measure which is used to determine benefit per unit cost and helps farmers in decision making activities. A study was carried out in the Sirajganj district during 2017, to compare the cost and revenue of Aus, Aman and Boro rice, using benefit cost ratio technique. The Sirajganj district consists of nine upzilas. Ten farmers of each upzila were randomly selected and primary data were personally collected from the respondents through structural questionnaire. The data about Aus, Aman and Boro rice and their cost as well as returns were collected in farmers’ field. The collected data were then sorted, scrutinized and analyzed to achieve the goal set for the study. Results revealed that the total cost of production in Aus rice varied 40856-71353 Tk./ha, gross returns 90651-123889 Tk./ha, cost of per kilogram rice production was 9.87 – 15.45 Tk./kg and BCR 1.61-2.22. The total cost of Aman (Local) rice varied 43031-69067 Tk./ha, gross returns 57651-86889 Tk./ha, cost of per kilogram rice production was 14.98 - 21.40 Tk./kg and BCR 1.25-1.65. The total cost of Aman (HYV) rice varied 66111-78724 Tk./ha, gross returns 123321-164439 Tk./ha, cost of per kilogram rice production was 9.87-14.45 Tk./kg and BCR 1.70-2.22. The total cost of Boro (HYV) rice varied 89129-96886 Tk./ha, gross returns 164439-208956 Tk./ha, cost of per kilogram rice production was 9.31-13.84 Tk./kg and BCR 1.90-2.31. The total cost of Boro (Hybrid) rice varied 92868-99684 Tk./ha, gross returns 205524-226083 Tk./ha, cost of per kilogram rice production 8.99-10.74 Tk./kg and BCR 2.10-2.36. Aus/Aman rice cultivation is eco-friendly i.e., needs less ground water, lower risk of early floods and hailstorms, etc.
Key Words: Aus rice, Aman rice, Boro rice, Cost, Return and Benefit cost-ratio.
Article Full-Text PDF
| 02.01.01.19_cost_of_production_and_cost_benefit_analysis_of_different_rice_in_sirajganj_district.pdf |
Article Metrics
|
Share This Article
|
|
Article Citations
MLA
Chanda, S. C. et al. “Cost of production and cost benefit analysis of different rice in Sirajganj district”. Asian Journal of Crop, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 01(01), (2019):07-14.
APA
Chanda, S. C., Ali, M. A., Haque, M. E., Abdullah, M. R. and Sarwar, A. K. M. G. (2019). Cost of production and cost benefit analysis of different rice in Sirajganj district. Asian Journal of Crop, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 01(01), 07-14.
Chicago
Chanda, S. C., Ali, M. A., Haque, M. E., Abdullah, M. R. and Sarwar, A. K. M. G. “Cost of production and cost benefit analysis of different rice in Sirajganj district”. Asian Journal of Crop, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 01(01), (2019):07-14.
Harvard
Chanda, S. C., Ali, M. A., Haque, M. E., Abdullah, M. R. and Sarwar, A. K. M. G. 2019. Cost of production and cost benefit analysis of different rice in Sirajganj district. Asian Journal of Crop, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 01(01), pp. 07-14.
Vancouver
Chanda, SC, Ali, MA, Haque, ME, Abdullah, MR and Sarwar, AKMG. Cost of production and cost benefit analysis of different rice in Sirajganj district. Asian Journal of Crop, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2019 May 01(01):07-14.
Chanda, S. C. et al. “Cost of production and cost benefit analysis of different rice in Sirajganj district”. Asian Journal of Crop, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 01(01), (2019):07-14.
APA
Chanda, S. C., Ali, M. A., Haque, M. E., Abdullah, M. R. and Sarwar, A. K. M. G. (2019). Cost of production and cost benefit analysis of different rice in Sirajganj district. Asian Journal of Crop, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 01(01), 07-14.
Chicago
Chanda, S. C., Ali, M. A., Haque, M. E., Abdullah, M. R. and Sarwar, A. K. M. G. “Cost of production and cost benefit analysis of different rice in Sirajganj district”. Asian Journal of Crop, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 01(01), (2019):07-14.
Harvard
Chanda, S. C., Ali, M. A., Haque, M. E., Abdullah, M. R. and Sarwar, A. K. M. G. 2019. Cost of production and cost benefit analysis of different rice in Sirajganj district. Asian Journal of Crop, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 01(01), pp. 07-14.
Vancouver
Chanda, SC, Ali, MA, Haque, ME, Abdullah, MR and Sarwar, AKMG. Cost of production and cost benefit analysis of different rice in Sirajganj district. Asian Journal of Crop, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2019 May 01(01):07-14.
References
- Ahmed, N., Ahmad, Z., Junaid, M. and Ali, A. (2015). Economic analysis based on benefit cost ratio approach for rice varieties of Malakand division. Journal of Economic and Sustainable Development, 6, 39-44.
- Chanda, S. C., Arshed, M. A. and Sarwar, A. K. M. G. (2018). Cost benefit analysis of Aman and Boro rice in Sirajganj district. International Conference on Research and Extension for Sustainable Rural Development. Held on 15-16 February, 2018, Rural Development Academy, Bogra, Bangladesh, pp: 110-111.
- Dash, J. K., Singh, R. P. and Pandey, R.K. (1995). Economic analysis of summer rice production in Baharagora block of Singhbhum district, Bihar- A case study. Journal of Research, Birsa Agricultural University, 7, 131-135.
- Dillon, J. L. and Hardaker, J. B. (1993). Farm management research for small farm development. Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations, Rome, Italy.
- Gangwar, B. and Dubey, R. P. (1996). Production potential and economic of rice based cropping sequences in Andaman Islands. Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika, 11, 85-90.
- Hussain, A., Khattak, N. U. R. and Khan, A. Q. (2008). Cost benefit analysis of different rice varieties in district Swat. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 24, 745-748.
- Said, A., Zada, A. and Tahir, M. (2000). Improved cultural practices for profitable rice production in North West Frontier Province. Pakistan: TASRAN Computer Associate, Mingora, Swat.
- Santha, A. M. (1993). A comparative analysis of cost and returns of Paddy cultivation for different seasons in Trichur, Kerala. Madras Agricultural Journal, 80, 41-44.
- Upendra, K. (1999). Economics of rice cultivation under different Eco-system- A case study of Pusa block of North Bihar. Annals of Applied Biology, 9, 97-99.
© 2019 The Authors. This article is freely available for anyone to read, share, download, print, permitted for unrestricted use and build upon, provided that the original author(s) and publisher are given due credit. All Published articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Asian Journal of Crop, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition EISSN 2706-5510.
