Asian Journal of Crop, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition

You are here: Home>AJCSP Journal​>AJCSP Archive>Article Page: ajcsp-060121-26.html
Asian J. Crop. Soil Plan. Nutri. | Volume 06, Issue 01, 213-220 | https://doi.org/10.18801/ajcsp.060121.26
​Article type: Research article | Received: 02.05.2021; Revised: 18.07.2021; First published online: 15 August, 2021.

Performance of different sugar beet genotypes under salinity stress

Md. Sazzad Hossain 1,4, Md. Istiyak Alam 1, Md. Masudur Rahman 2,4, Palash Mandal 1, Md. Kamrul Hasan 3,4 and Shirin Akter 5
1 Department of Agronomy and Haor Agriculture, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh.
2 Department of Crop Botany and Tea Production Technology, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh.
3 Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh.
4 Laboratory of Interdisciplinary Research for Future Agriculture (IRFA), Faculty of Agriculture, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh.
5 Dept. of Agricultural Extension, Ministry of Agriculture, Bangladesh

​✉   Article correspondence: [email protected] (Hossain, MS).
Abstract
The experiment was conducted at the BINA sub-station, Rahmatpur, Barishal, during the period from April 2020 to August 2020 to investigate the effect of nitrogen on the yield of transplant Aus rice cv. Binadhan-19. The experiment comprised four levels of nitrogen viz (a) N0 (zero nitrogen), (b) N1 (90 kg N/ha), (c) N2 (110 kg N/ha) and (d) N3 (130 kg N/ha). Nitrogen fertilizer was applied at two splits. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Results revealed that plant height, effective tiller, non-effective tiller, flag leaf length, filled gran, unfilled grain and 1000 grain weight were increased with increasing nitrogen doses till 110 kg N ha-1. Furthermore, the highest grain weight was recorded in 110 kg N ha-1 due to superior performance of yield contributing characters of BInadhan-19. A positive correlation was found between grain yield and total dry matter production. The experimental results concluded that 110 kg N ha-1 would be the best dose for higher gain yield in Binadhan-19 in aus season.

Key Words: Rice, Nitrogen, Nitrogen level, Binadhan-19 and Yield
Article Full-Text PDF:
26.06.01.21_performance_of_different_sugar_beet_genotypes_under_salinity_stress.pdf
File Size: 833 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
Article Metrics:
Share This Article
Article Citations
MLA
Hossain, et al. ” Performance of different sugar beet genotypes under salinity stress”. Asian Journal of Crop, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 06(01), (2021): 213-220.
 
APA
Hossain, M. S., Alam, M. I., Rahman, M. M., Mandal, P., Hasan, M. K. and Akter, S. (2021). Performance of different sugar beet genotypes under salinity stress. Asian Journal of Crop, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 06(01), 213-220.
 
Chicago
Hossain, M. S., Alam, M. I., Rahman, M. M., Mandal, P., Hasan, M. K. and Akter, S. “performance of different sugar beet genotypes under salinity stress”. Asian Journal of Crop, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 06(01), (2021): 213-220.
 
Harvard
Hossain, M. S., Alam, M. I., Rahman, M. M., Mandal, P., Hasan, M. K. and Akter, S. 2021. Performance of different sugar beet genotypes under salinity stress. Asian Journal of Crop, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 06(01), pp. 213-220.
 
Vancouver
Hossain, MS, Alam, MI, Rahman, MM, Mandal, P, Hasan, MK and Akter, S. Performance of different sugar beet genotypes under salinity stress. Asian Journal of Crop, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, August 2021 06(01), 213-220.
References
  1. Ahmad, S., Zubair, M., Iqbal, N., Cheema, N. M. and Mahmood, K. (2012). Evaluation of sugar beet hybrid varieties under Thal-Kumbi soil series of Pakistan. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 14, 605-608.
  2. Akter, S., Rahman, M. M., Mandal, P., Hoque, M., Miah, M. N. H., Islam, M. M., Hasan, M. K. and Hossain, M. S. (2021). Yield of four sugar beet genotypes in acidic soils with various soil amendments. Journal of Agriculture, Food and Environment, (1), 38-44.  https://doi.org/10.47440/JAFE.2021.2107
  3. Babaee, B., Noghabi, M. A., Akbar, M. R. J. and Abadi, V. Y. (2013). The appropriate method for determining of sugar content in sugar beet produced under drought, salinity and normal conditions. Journal of Sugar Beet, 29, 53-59.
  4. BARC (Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council). (2018). Fertilizer Recommendation Guide-2018.Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council (BARC), Farmgate, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  5. BBS (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics) (2019). Yearbook of Agricultural Statistics. Statistics and Informatics Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh: Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  6. BSRI (Bangladesh Sugarcane Research Institute). (2011). Sugarbeet cultivation in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Sugarcane Research Institute.  Ishurdi, Pabna, Bangladesh. 4.
  7. BSRI (Bangladesh Sugarcane Research Institute). (2013). Annual report of 2012, 64–70. Pabna: Ishurdi, Bangladesh.
  8. Chen, J. and Mueller, V. (2018). Coastal climate change, soil salinity and human migration in Bangladesh. Nature Climate Change, 8, 981–85. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0313-8
  9. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). (2010). Production Yearbook. Food and Agriculture Organization, Roam. 54, 71 - 79.
  10. Horie, T. and Schroeder, J. I. (2004). Sodium transporters in plants. Diverse genes and physiological functions. Plant Physiology, 136(1), 2457-2462.
  11. Horie, T., Karahara, I. and Katsuhara, M. (2012). Salinity tolerance mechanisms in glycophytes: An overview with the central focus on rice plants. Rice, 5, 11-29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1939-8433-5-11
  12. Hossain, M. S. and Dietz, K. J. (2016). Tuning of Redox Regulatory Mechanisms, Reactive Oxygen Species and Redox Homeostasis under Salinity Stress. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 548. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00548
  13. Hossain, M. S., ElSayed, A. I., Moore, M. and Dietz, K. J. (2017a). Redox and reactive oxygen species network in acclimation for salinity tolerance in sugar beet. Journal of Experimental Botany, 68(5), 1283-98.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx019
  14. Hossain, M. S., Persicke, M., ElSayed, A. I., Kalinowski, J. and Dietz, K. J. (2017b). Metabolite profiling at the cellular and subcellular level reveals metabolites associated with salinity tolerance in sugar beet. Journal of Experimental Botany, 68(21-22), 5961-76.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx388
  15. Iqbal, M. A. and Saleem A. M. (2015). Sugar beet potential to beat sugarcane as a sugar crop in Pakistan. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 15(1), 36-44.
  16. Liu, L., Wang, B., Liu, D., Zou, C., Wu, P., Wang, Z., Wang, Y. and Li, C. (2020). Transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses reveal mechanisms of adaptation to salinity in which carbon and nitrogen metabolism is altered in sugar beet roots. BMC Plant Biology, 20, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02349-9
  17. Magaña, C., Núñez-Sánchez, N., Fernández-Cabanás, V. M., García, P., Serrano, A., Pérez-Marín, D., Pemán, J. M. and Alcalde, E. (2011). Direct prediction of bioethanol yield in sugar beet pulp using near infrared spectroscopy. Bioresource Technology, 102, 9542–9549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.045
  18. Munns, R., James, R. A., Xu, B., Athman, A., Conn, S. J., Jordans, C., Byrt, C. S., Hare, R. A., Tyerman, S. D., Tester, M. and Plett, D. (2012). Wheat grain yield on saline soils is improved by an ancestral Na+ transporter gene. Nature Biotechnology, 30(4), 360-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2120
  19. Özbay, S. and Yildirim, M. (2018). Root Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet under Drip and Sprinkler Irrigation with Foliar Application of Micronutrients. ÇOMÜ ZiraatFakültesiDergisi, 6, 105–114.
  20. R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria URL http://www.R-project.org/.
  21. Rahman, M. S., Khatun, S. and Rahman, M. K. (2016). Sugarcane and sugar industry in Bangladesh: An overview. Sugar Tech, 18, 627-635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-016-0489-z
  22. Sairam, R. K. and Tyagi, A. (2004). Physiology and molecular biology of salinity stress tolerance in plants. Current Science, 86, 407–421.
  23. Sanghera, G. S., Singh, R. P., Kashyap, L., Tyagi, V. and Sharma, B. (2016). Evaluation of sugar beet genotypes (Beta Vulgaris L.) for root yield and quality traits under subtropical conditions. Journal of Krishi Vigyan, 5(1), 67–73.  https://doi.org/10.5958/2349-4433.2016.00037.4
  24. Sathee, L., Sairam, R. K., Chinnusamy, V. and Jha, S. K. (2015). Differential transcript abundance of salt overly sensitive (SOS) pathway genes is a determinant of salinity stress tolerance of wheat. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 37, 169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-015-1910-z
  25. Tan, L., Sun, Z. Y., Okamoto, S., Takaki, M., Tang, Y. Q., Morimura, S. and Kida, K. (2015). Production of ethanol from raw juice and thick juice of sugar beet by continuous ethanol fermentation with flocculating yeast strain KF-7. Biomass and Bioenergy, 81, 265-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.07.019
  26. Vastarelli, P., Moschella, A., Pacifico, D. and Mandolino, G. (2013). Water stress in Beta vulgaris: osmotic adjustment response and gene expression analysis in ssp. vulgaris and maritime. American Journal of Plant Science, 4, 11–16.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2013.41003
  27. Watson, L. and Dallwitz, M. J. (1992). Onwards. The families of flowering plants: descriptions, illustrations, identification, and information retrieval. http://delta–intkey.com/angio/, version, 25.
  28. Yang, L., Zhang, Y., Zhu, N., Koh, J., Ma, C., Pan, Y., Yu, B., Chen, S. and Li, H. (2013). Proteomic analysis of salt tolerance in sugar beet monosomic addition line M14. Journal of Proteome Research, 12, 4931–4950. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr400177m
  29. Zhao, C., Zhang, H., Song, C., Zhu, J. K. and Shabala, S. (2020). Mechanisms of plant responses and adaptation to soil salinity. The Innovation, 1(1), 100017.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2020.100017
  30. Zhu, J. K. (2016). Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell, 167, 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.029
© 2021 The Authors. This article is freely available for anyone to read, share, download, print, permitted for unrestricted use and build upon, provided that the original author(s) and publisher are given due credit. All Published articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
​Require any changes or update in this article? Please contact from HERE.
Asian Journal of Crop, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition EISSN ​2706-5510​.

Submit Manuscript

Submission
Copyright: Journal BiNET 2014-2023. All rights reserved. Terms | Privacy | Feedback | Advertise with us | We are hiring !
  •