You are here: Home>IJBMSR Journal​>IJBMSR Archive>Article Page: ijbmsr-050118-32.html

​International Journal of Business, Management and Social Research

submit Manuscript

Int. J. Bus. Manag. Soc. Res. | Volume 05, Issue 01, 289-300| https://doi.org/10.18801/ijbmsr.050118.32
​Article type: Research article, Received: 17.08.2018, Revised: 29.11.2018, Date of Publication: 25 December 2018.

Measurement of knowledge loss in an organization: a case study

Prasanta Kumar Nath 1, Pranjal Bezborah 2 and Mithun J. Sharma 3
1 Dept. of L and D,CC and CSR, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, AOD Digboi, Assam, India
2 Dept. of Commerce, Dibrugarh University, Dibrugarh, Assam, India
3 Directorate of Open and Distance Learning, Dibrugarh University, Dibrugarh, Assam, India.

Abstract
In the competitive world, an organization can sustain in its business if its human resources are well maintained and utilized. Workforces are trained and made them fit to work in the organization. Their knowledge is used to get the desired result for the benefit of the organization. So, the knowledge gained by the workforce during their stay in the organization has got equal importance as compared to the profit the organization looking for. The knowledge that has been gained during the tenure of an employee in the organization is lost from the day he/she separates from the organization. The purpose of this paper is to establish that knowledge loss can be calculated in quantitative terms apart from qualitative statements and these quantitative terms of knowledge loss may help organizations for strategic decision on retention of knowledge through better understanding and visualization of loss. The study made in one of the units of a public sector organization in India having nine operative units across the country. This is an exploratory nature of case study, conducted open-ended interview. Primary data were collected from HR department and face to face interview with senior managers. Analysis done based on data collected and measurement of knowledge loss calculated. This paper established that knowledge loss can be calculated in quantitative terms using some formula based on certain data with respect to the employee in the organization in respective position.
 
Key Words: Knowledge management, Knowledge worth, Expertise, Expert level, Performance Appraisal and Strategies

Article Full-Text PDF

32.01.05.18_measurement_of_knowledge_loss_in_an_organization_a_case_study.pdf
File Size:	825 kb
File Type:	pdf

Download File

---

---

Share This Article

Citations of This Article

MLA
Nath, P. K., Bezborah, P. and Sharma, M. J. “Measurement of knowledge loss in an organization: a case study.” International Journal of Business, Management and Social Research 05(01) (2018): 289-300.
 
APA
Nath, P. K., Bezborah, P. and Sharma, M. J. (2018). Measurement of knowledge loss in an organization: a case study. International Journal of Business, Management and Social Research, 05(01), 289-300.
 
Chicago
Nath, P. K., Bezborah, P. and Sharma, M. J. “Measurement of knowledge loss in an organization: a case study.” International Journal of Business, Management and Social Research 05(01) (2018): 289-300.
 
Harvard
Nath, P. K., Bezborah, P. and Sharma, M. J. 2018. Measurement of knowledge loss in an organization: a case study. International Journal of Business, Management and Social Research, 05(01), pp. 289-300.
 
Vancouver
Nath, P. K., Bezborah, P. and Sharma, M. J. Measurement of knowledge loss in an organization: a case study. International Journal of Business, Management and Social Research. 2018 December 05(01): 289-300.

References

1. Alva, M. and Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review – Knowledge management and knowledge management system: Conceptual functions and research issues. MIS Quarterly 25(1), 107-136.
2. Alavi, M. and Tiwana, A. (2003). Knowledge management: the information technology dimension. In: Easterby-Smith, M. and Lyles, M.A. (Eds), The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, Blackwell, Malden, MA, pp. 104-121.
3. Argote L, McEvily B and Reagans R (2003). Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative frame-work and review of emerging themes. Management Science 49(4), 571–582.
4. Bender, S. and Fish, A (2000). The transfer of knowledge and the retention of expertise: the continuing need for global assignments. Journal of Knowledge Management 4(2), 125-137.
5. Brown, M.V. and Galli-Debicella, A.L. (2009). Aging workforce: how will companies, workers cope? Plant Engineer 36(10), p. 11.
6. Campos, E.B. and Sa´nchez, M.P.S. (2003). Knowledge management in the emerging strategic business process: information complexity and imagination. Journal of Knowledge Management 7(2), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270310477252
7. David, G. Allen (2008). Retaining  Talent : A Guide to Analyzing and Managing Employee Turnover. Society for Human Resource Management.
8. DeLong, D. W. and Davenport, T. (2003). Better practices for retaining organizational knowledge: lessons from the leading edge. Employment Relations Today 30(3), pp. 51-63.
9. DeLong, D. W. (2004). Lost Knowledge : Confronting The Threat of an Aging Workforce, Oxford University Press , Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195170979.001.0001
10. Duhon, B. (1998). It's all in our heads. Inform, 12(8).
11. Droege, S.B. and Hoobler, J. M. (2003). Employee turnover and tacit knowledge diffusion: A network perspective. Jounal of Managerial Issues 15 (1), 50-61.
12. Fahey, L. and Prusak, L. (1998). The eleven deadliest sins of knowledge management, California Management Review 40(3), 265-276. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165954
13. Fisher, S. R. and White, M. A. (2000). Downsizing in a learning organization: Are there hidden costs? Academy of Management Review 25(1), 244–251.
14. Foster, L. (2005). Confronting the global brain drain. Knowledge Management Review, 8(5), 28-31.
15. Grant,  R. M.  (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal ,17 (Winter Special Issue), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
16. Gotthart, B. and Haghi, G. (2009). How Hewlett-Packard minimizes knowledge loss. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 9 (2/3), p. 305.
17. Hedlund, G. (1994) A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250151006
18. Hitt,  M.A., Bierman, L., Shimizu, K. and Kochhar, R. (2001). Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 13–28.
19. Juliano, J. J. (2004). Gen-X and Gen-Y: teaching them the business’’, Public Utilities Fortnightly,142(6),82-85.
20. Leonrd,  D. and Sensiper, S. (1998). The  role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. California Management  Review, 40(3),112-132. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165946
21. Kothari, C. R. (2011). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques.
22. King, A. W., Fowler, S. W., and Zeithaml, C. P. (2001). Managing organizational competencies for competitive advantage : The middle management edge. Academy of Management Executive, 15(2), 95-106.
23. Liebowitz, J. (2009). Knowledge Retention: Strategies and Solutions.
24. Marsh, S. J. and Stock, G. N. (2006). Creating dynamic capability: The role of intertemporal integration, knowl¬edge retention, and interpretation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(5), 422–436.
25. Mayo, A. (2003). Irretrievable losses. Training Journal, June, p. 48.
26. Nicholson, N. (2008). Empower the next generation. Communication World, 25(2), 14-18.
27. Noe, R. A., Colquitt, J. A., Simmering, M. J. and Alvarez, S. A. (2003). Knowledge management: developing intellectual and social capital, in Jackson, S. E., Hitt, M. A. and DeNisi, A. S. (Eds), Managing Knowledge for Sustained Competitive Advantage: Designing Strategies for Effective Human Resource Management, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 209-42.
28. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1) pp. 14-37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
29. Olivera, F. (2000). Memory systems in organizations: An empirical investigation of mechanisms for knowledge collection, storage and access. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 811–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00205
30. Perrott, B. E. (2007). A strategic risk approach to knowledge management.  Business Horizons , 50(6), 523-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2007.08.002
31. Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G. and Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organisational ambidexterity: Balabcing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organisation Science, 20(4), 685-695. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0428
32. Silke, B. and Alan F. (2000). The transfer of knowledge and the retention of expertise: the continuing need for global assignments. Journal of Knowledge Management,  4(2), pp. 125-137.
33. Sandhawalia, B. S. and Dalcher, D. (2011). Developing knowledge management capabilities: a structured approach. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(2), 313-328. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111119718
34. Silke, B. and Alan, Fish. (2000). Journal of Knowledge Management ,4 (2), 125-137.
35. Starbuck, W. H. (1992). Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. Journal of Management Studies, 29(6), 713-740. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00686.x
36. Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-based Assets, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
37. Walsh, J. P. and Ungson, G. R. (1991). Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16(1),57–91. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278992

---

© 2018 The Authors. This article is freely available for anyone to read, share, download, print, permitted for unrestricted use and build upon, provided that the original author(s) and publisher are given due credit. All Published articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

​Require any changes or update in this article? Please contact from HERE.

International Journal of Business, Management and Social Research, EISSN 2412-8279.