• Home
  • Journals
  • For Authors
    • Why Publish With Us
    • Manuscript Preparation
    • Journal Indexing
    • Similarity Index
    • Article Processing Charge
  • Review and Editorial
    • Review Policy
    • Editorial Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
  • Archive
  • Contact Us
JOURNAL BINET
  • Home
  • Journals
  • For Authors
    • Why Publish With Us
    • Manuscript Preparation
    • Journal Indexing
    • Similarity Index
    • Article Processing Charge
  • Review and Editorial
    • Review Policy
    • Editorial Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
  • Archive
  • Contact Us
​You are here: Home>JBAR Journal>JBAR-Volume-07>jbar-070216-76.html

Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research 


Research article: 
In vitro regeneration potentiality of some Brassica genotypes
 
S. C. Das (a), L. Hassan (a), M. A. Quddus (a) and B. P. Ray (b)
 
aDept. of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh
bBiotechnology Division, Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
​
J. bios. agric. res. | Volume 07, Issue 02, pp. 638-646 | Available online: 31 March 2016
DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.18801/jbar.070216.76
76_in_vitro_regeneration__potentiality_of_some_brassica_genotypes.pdf
File Size: 1547 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File



  • Abstract
  • Citations
  • References
<
>
Title: In vitro regeneration potentiality of some Brassica genotypes
​Abstract: Ten genotypes of Brassica, from three different groups of species, namely Tori-7, Kallyania, Sampad, Sonali (each from Brassica campestris), BARI sarisa-7, BARI sarisa-8 and MM-20-3 (each from Brassica napus), Rai-5, Shambal and Daulat (each from Brassica juncea) were selected to observe their in vitro regeneration potentiality using stem segment as the explants. Investigations on regeneration of these ten genotypes were accomplished with callus induction, maintenance of calli, organogenesis and finally plantlet regeneration and subsequent their establishment in the field condition. Among the varieties, BARI sarisa-8 showed the highest response in all aspects. Callus induction was highest in BARI sarisa-8 (99.60%) and lowest in Sonali (92.40%). Time required for shoot initiation was minimum in BARI sarisa-8 (21.12days) while it was maximum in Kallyania (25.12days). Number of shoots per callus was highest in BARI sarisa-8 (2.502) and lowest in MM-20-3 (1.208). Number of rooted shoots was highest in BARI sarisa-8 (55.56%). Survival rate of regenerated plantlets was highest in BARI sarisa-8 (80.00% in pot and 75.00% in soil) while the same was lowest in Kallyania (61.11% in pot) and in BARI sarisa-7 (30.00% in soil).
Key Words: In vitro regeneration, Brassica, Hypocotyl segment, Genotypes and Potentiality
​APA (American Psychological Association)
Das, S. C., Hassan, L., Quddus, M. A. & Ray, B. P. (2016). In vitro regeneration potentiality of some Brassica genotypes. Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research, 07(02), 638-646.

MLA (Modern Language Association) 
Das, S. C., Hassan, L., Quddus, M. A. & Ray, B. P. "In vitro regeneration potentiality of some Brassica genotypes." Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research, 07.02 (2016), 638-646.

Chicago/Turabian
Das, S. C., Hassan, L., Quddus, M. A. & Ray, B. P.  In vitro regeneration potentiality of some Brassica genotypes. Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research, 07, no. 02 (2016), 638-646.
  1. Ahmed, Q. A. (1952). Fungi of East Bengal. Pak. J. For., 2, 91-115.
  2. Antonio, B. A., Namai, H. & Kikuchi, F. (1987). Tissue culture ability of vegetative organs from different cultivars of Brassica. SABRAO Journal, 19(2), 73-79.
  3. BBS. (1999). Statistical Pocket Book of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Statistics Division, Ministry of planning, Govt. of the People,s Republic of Bangladesh. p. 145.
  4. Cardoza, V. & Stewart, N. C. (2006). Canola (Brassica napus L.). Methods Mol. Biol. (ed. Wang, K.). Human Press Inc., Totowa, New Jersey. 343, 257-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1385/1-59745-130-4:257
  5. Downey, R. K. & Robbelen, G. (1989). Brassica species: Oil crops of the world, their breeding and utilization. Mc Graw Hill Publishing Co. New York. pp. 339-374.
  6. Du, H., Zhuang, D. H. & Hunang, W. H. (2000). Stimulation effect of silver nitrate on shoot regeneration in cotyledon tissue culture of Brassica campestris. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 8(2), 109-112.
  7. Hachey, J. E., Sharma, K. K. & Moloney, M. M. (1991). Efficient shoot regeneration of Brassica campestris using cotyledon explants cultured in vitro. Plant Cell Rep,. 9 (100), 549-554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00232329
  8. Javed, M. A. & Hassan, S. (1992). Callusing and regeneration response of cotyledon explants of some rapeseed genotypes. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture,. 8(3), 329-334.
  9. Khan, M. R., Rashid, H. & Quraishi, A. (2002). Effect of various growth regulators on callus formation and regeneration in Brassica napus cv. Oscar. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 5, 693-695. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2002.693.695
  10. Maeda, E., Inoue, M. & Chen, M. H. (1981). Regulatory mechanism of shoot formation in rice callus. In: A. N. Rao (ed.). Proc. COSTED. Symp. on Tissue Culture of Economically Important Plants. Singapore. pp. 1-6.
  11. Meah, M. B. (1986). Management of diseases of oilseeds; mustard, groundnut, sesame. In: BAU Research Progress. Workshop held on 4-5 October, 1986. 1,82-100.
  12. Meah, M. B., Howlider, M. A. R. & Alam, M. K. (1988). Effect of fungicide spray at different time and frequencies on Alternaria blight of mustard. Thai. J. Agric. Sci., 21, 101-107.
  13. Murashige, T. & Skoog, F. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant., 15, 473-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
  14. Ono, Y., Takahata, Y. & Kaizuma, N. (1994). Effect of genotype on shoot regeneration from cotyledonary explants of rapeseed (Brassica napus) . Plant Cell Rep., 14(1), 13-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00233290
  15. Pachauri, R. K. (2001). Significance of oilseed research in India. TERIvision, India. 37: 2.
  16. Puddephat, I. J., Riggs, T. J. & Fenning, T. M. (1996). Transformation of Brassica oleracea L.: a critical review. Mol. Breed, 2, 185-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00564197
  17. Tang, G. X. & Jhou, W. J. (2001). Studies on the enhancement of plant regeneration frequency in Brassica napus in vitro culture. Journal of Zhejiang University Agriculture and Life Science, 27(5), 527-530.
  18. Wang, J. X., Sun, Y., Cui, G. M., Liu, S. X., Wang, G. P., Shang, Y. J. & Wang, H. (2000). Effects of plant growth regulators and genotypes on the differentiation of in vitro cultured hypocotyls of rapeseed (Brassica). Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 22(1), 11-13.
Open Access | Read Article
© Das et al. (2016). This article published by Journal BiNET is freely available for anyone to read, share, download, print, permitted for unrestricted use and build upon, provided that the original author(s) and publisher are given due credit. All Published articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

For Authors

Browse journals
​
Manuscript preparation
Author downloads
Journal indexing
Journal help
​Journal blog

Submit Manuscript

Submission

Join as reviewer
Copyright: Journal BiNET 2014-2023. All rights reserved. Terms | Privacy | Feedback | Advertise with us | We are hiring !
  • Home
  • Journals
  • For Authors
    • Why Publish With Us
    • Manuscript Preparation
    • Journal Indexing
    • Similarity Index
    • Article Processing Charge
  • Review and Editorial
    • Review Policy
    • Editorial Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
  • Archive
  • Contact Us