Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research |
|
RESEARCH ARTICLE:
Participatory evaluation of wheat genotypes under different tillage practice in Dinajpur, Bangladesh
Md. Monirul Islam (a), Md. Abul Bashar (a), Nasima Akhter (b), Mahfuza Afroj (c), Motiur Rahman (d), Md. Mahfuzar Rahman (e) and Md. Abdullahil Baque (e)
aDept. of Agricultural Extension and Information system, Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka-1207
b Dept. of Agricultural Botany, Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka-1207
c Dept. of Agribusiness and Marketing, Faculty of Agribusiness management, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka-1207
d Dept. of Geography and Environment, Faculty of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Dhaka
e Dept. of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka-1207, Bangladesh.
J. bios. agric. res. | Volume 10, Issue 01, pp. 866-870 | Available online: 14 November 2016
DOI: 10.18801/jbar.100116.105
Participatory evaluation of wheat genotypes under different tillage practice in Dinajpur, Bangladesh
Md. Monirul Islam (a), Md. Abul Bashar (a), Nasima Akhter (b), Mahfuza Afroj (c), Motiur Rahman (d), Md. Mahfuzar Rahman (e) and Md. Abdullahil Baque (e)
aDept. of Agricultural Extension and Information system, Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka-1207
b Dept. of Agricultural Botany, Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka-1207
c Dept. of Agribusiness and Marketing, Faculty of Agribusiness management, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka-1207
d Dept. of Geography and Environment, Faculty of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Dhaka
e Dept. of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka-1207, Bangladesh.
J. bios. agric. res. | Volume 10, Issue 01, pp. 866-870 | Available online: 14 November 2016
DOI: 10.18801/jbar.100116.105
FULL TEXT PDF:
| 105_jbar_participatory_evaluation_of_wheat_genotypes_under_different_tillage_practice.pdf |
Title: Participatory evaluation of wheat genotypes under different tillage practice in Dinajpur, Bangladesh
Abstract: This study was conducted on a farmer field in Dinajpur district to facilitate farmer selecting their suitable wheat genotypes. It is needed for doing well in resource conserving tillage and also to find out the interaction between genotype and tillage in Rice-Wheat cropping system. The highest farmer score at post evaluation was obtained by BAW 1006 than other genotypes under studied mainly due to higher yield and good quality grain. Results demonstrated that BAW 1006 performed better in most of the tillage system, BAW 1008 in bed system and Shatabdi in strip. Data of percentage Diseased Leaf Area indicated that BAW 1006 was more infected by pests and diseases at conventional and power tiller operated seeder tillage system while more tolerant at bed planting spikes per square meter yield. The highest yield was recorded in conventional system followed by power tiller operated seeder, bed and the lowest at strip tillage. On the other hand, the highest yield was produced by BAW 1008 followed by BAW 1004, BAW 1006, Shatabdi, BAW 966 and Kanchan. BAW 1008 performed better in conventional bed and strip tillage where BAW 1006 and Shatabdi performed better in power tiller operated seeder system.
Key Words: Participatory evaluation, Wheat genotypes and Tillage systems
Abstract: This study was conducted on a farmer field in Dinajpur district to facilitate farmer selecting their suitable wheat genotypes. It is needed for doing well in resource conserving tillage and also to find out the interaction between genotype and tillage in Rice-Wheat cropping system. The highest farmer score at post evaluation was obtained by BAW 1006 than other genotypes under studied mainly due to higher yield and good quality grain. Results demonstrated that BAW 1006 performed better in most of the tillage system, BAW 1008 in bed system and Shatabdi in strip. Data of percentage Diseased Leaf Area indicated that BAW 1006 was more infected by pests and diseases at conventional and power tiller operated seeder tillage system while more tolerant at bed planting spikes per square meter yield. The highest yield was recorded in conventional system followed by power tiller operated seeder, bed and the lowest at strip tillage. On the other hand, the highest yield was produced by BAW 1008 followed by BAW 1004, BAW 1006, Shatabdi, BAW 966 and Kanchan. BAW 1008 performed better in conventional bed and strip tillage where BAW 1006 and Shatabdi performed better in power tiller operated seeder system.
Key Words: Participatory evaluation, Wheat genotypes and Tillage systems
APA (American Psychological Association)
Islam, M. M., Bashar, M. A., Akhter, N., Afroj, M., Rahman, M., Rahman, M. M. & Baque, M. A. (2016). Participatory evaluation of wheat genotypes under different tillage practices. Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research, 10(01), 866-870.
MLA (Modern Language Association)
Islam, M. M., Bashar, M. A., Akhter, N., Afroj, M., Rahman, M., Rahman, M. M. & Baque, M. A. "Participatory evaluation of wheat genotypes under different tillage practices". Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research, 10.01 (2016), 866-870.
Chicago/Turabian
Islam, M. M., Bashar, M. A., Akhter, N., Afroj, M., Rahman, M., Rahman, M. M. & Baque, M. A. Participatory evaluation of wheat genotypes under different tillage practices. Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research, 10, no. 01 (2016), 866-870.
Islam, M. M., Bashar, M. A., Akhter, N., Afroj, M., Rahman, M., Rahman, M. M. & Baque, M. A. (2016). Participatory evaluation of wheat genotypes under different tillage practices. Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research, 10(01), 866-870.
MLA (Modern Language Association)
Islam, M. M., Bashar, M. A., Akhter, N., Afroj, M., Rahman, M., Rahman, M. M. & Baque, M. A. "Participatory evaluation of wheat genotypes under different tillage practices". Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research, 10.01 (2016), 866-870.
Chicago/Turabian
Islam, M. M., Bashar, M. A., Akhter, N., Afroj, M., Rahman, M., Rahman, M. M. & Baque, M. A. Participatory evaluation of wheat genotypes under different tillage practices. Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research, 10, no. 01 (2016), 866-870.
- Anonymous (2008). Statistical year book of Bangladesh—2006. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Planning Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Retrived from www.bbs.gov.bd, 4 November 2012.
- Gupta, R. K. & Seth, A. (2007) A review of resource conserving technologies for sustainable management of the rice wheat systems of the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Crop Protection, 26(3), 436-447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2006.04.030
- Hossain, A. & Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2013). Wheat production in Bangladesh: its future in the light of global warming. AoB Plants, 5, pls042. http://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/pls042
- Malik, R. K., Yadav, A., Singh, S., Sardana, P. K., Gill, G., Hobbs P. R. and Bellinder, R. (2003) Herbicide resistance management and introduction of zero tillage in wheat in India. Proceedings of Weed Science Society of America, 43-55.
- Meisner, C. A. (1991). Report of an on-farm survey of the greater Comilla Region : wheat growers practices, perceptions, and their implications. Monograph No. 13, BARI, Wheat Research Centre, Nashipur, Dinajpur.
- Sarker, R. I. (1987). Effect of Tillage on water use. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 1, 21-29.
- Saunders, D. (1991). Report of an on-farm survey of the Jessore and Kustia Districts: Wheat farmers practices and their perceptions. Monograph No. 8. BARI, Wheat Research Centre, Nashipur, Dinajpur.
Open Access | Read Article
© Islam et al. (2016). This article published by Journal BiNET is freely available for anyone to read, share, download, print, permitted for unrestricted use and build upon, provided that the original author(s) and publisher are given due credit. All Published articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
