J. Bios. Agric. Res. | Volume 18, Issue 02, 1549-1568| https://doi.org/10.18801/jbar.180218.190
Article type: Research article, Received: 16.08.2018, Revised: 07.12.2018, Date of Publication: 25 December 2018.
Article type: Research article, Received: 16.08.2018, Revised: 07.12.2018, Date of Publication: 25 December 2018.
Effects of conservation agriculture on crop and system productivity and profitability under maize based system in far western Nepal
Hari Kumar Prasai 1, Shrawan Kumar Sah 2, Anand Kumar Gautam 3 and Anant Prasad Regmi 4
1, 3, 4 Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Regional Agricultural Research Station (RARS), Doti, Nepal.
2 Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal.
1, 3, 4 Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Regional Agricultural Research Station (RARS), Doti, Nepal.
2 Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal.
Abstract
Intensive conventional tillage practices in Doti district, far western Nepal has been experiencing low crop productivity and profitability. A shift towards conservation agriculture (CA) practices improve the crop production and farmer’s net income. This research assessed the effects over two consecutive years (2014/15– 2015/16) of CA system on crop and system productivity and profitability of different maize-based cropping system. This study under split-split plot design with four replications examined the effects of two cropping systems (Maize-wheat-mungbean and maize-lentil-mungbean), two cultural practices (CA and conventional agricultural practices) and four varietal sequences (Rajkumar-Dhaulagiri and Shimal-Pratikshya, Rajkumar-WK 1204 and Khajura1-Pratikshya, Arun2-Dhaulagiri and Shimal-Kalyan and Arun 2-WK 1204 and Khajura1-Kalyan). Results showed that cereal-cereal-legume cropping system, CA practices and varietal sequence of Rajkumar-WK 1204-Pratikshya produced 10.87% higher system yield (12.85 t ha-1yr-1) than conventional agricultural practices (11.59 t ha-1yr-1), 83.47% higher system net benefit (1554 US$ ha-1yr-1) than conventional agricultural practices (847 US$ ha-1yr-1) and 7.76% higher maize equivalent yield (17.08 t ha-1yr-1) than conventional agricultural practices (15.85 t ha-1yr-1). Similarly, cereal-legume-legume cropping system, CA practices and varietal sequence of Rajkumar-Khajura1-Pratikshya produced 19.62% higher system yield (9.39 t ha-1yr-1) than conventional agricultural practices (7.85 t ha-1yr-1), 139.39% higher system net benefit (1594 US$ ha-1yr-1) than conventional agricultural practices (666 US$ ha-1yr-1) and 12.70% higher maize equivalent yield (16.50 t ha-1yr-1) than conventional agricultural practices (14.64 t ha-1yr-1). Therefore, farmers should apply cereal-cereal-legume cropping system (irrigated condition), cereal-legume-legume cropping system (rainfed condition), CA practices and varietal sequence of Rajkumar-WK 1204-Pratikshya and Rajkumar-Khajura1-Pratikshya for higher system productivity and profitability.
Key Words: Conservation vs conventional agriculture, Maize yield, Net benefit and Cropping system
Intensive conventional tillage practices in Doti district, far western Nepal has been experiencing low crop productivity and profitability. A shift towards conservation agriculture (CA) practices improve the crop production and farmer’s net income. This research assessed the effects over two consecutive years (2014/15– 2015/16) of CA system on crop and system productivity and profitability of different maize-based cropping system. This study under split-split plot design with four replications examined the effects of two cropping systems (Maize-wheat-mungbean and maize-lentil-mungbean), two cultural practices (CA and conventional agricultural practices) and four varietal sequences (Rajkumar-Dhaulagiri and Shimal-Pratikshya, Rajkumar-WK 1204 and Khajura1-Pratikshya, Arun2-Dhaulagiri and Shimal-Kalyan and Arun 2-WK 1204 and Khajura1-Kalyan). Results showed that cereal-cereal-legume cropping system, CA practices and varietal sequence of Rajkumar-WK 1204-Pratikshya produced 10.87% higher system yield (12.85 t ha-1yr-1) than conventional agricultural practices (11.59 t ha-1yr-1), 83.47% higher system net benefit (1554 US$ ha-1yr-1) than conventional agricultural practices (847 US$ ha-1yr-1) and 7.76% higher maize equivalent yield (17.08 t ha-1yr-1) than conventional agricultural practices (15.85 t ha-1yr-1). Similarly, cereal-legume-legume cropping system, CA practices and varietal sequence of Rajkumar-Khajura1-Pratikshya produced 19.62% higher system yield (9.39 t ha-1yr-1) than conventional agricultural practices (7.85 t ha-1yr-1), 139.39% higher system net benefit (1594 US$ ha-1yr-1) than conventional agricultural practices (666 US$ ha-1yr-1) and 12.70% higher maize equivalent yield (16.50 t ha-1yr-1) than conventional agricultural practices (14.64 t ha-1yr-1). Therefore, farmers should apply cereal-cereal-legume cropping system (irrigated condition), cereal-legume-legume cropping system (rainfed condition), CA practices and varietal sequence of Rajkumar-WK 1204-Pratikshya and Rajkumar-Khajura1-Pratikshya for higher system productivity and profitability.
Key Words: Conservation vs conventional agriculture, Maize yield, Net benefit and Cropping system
Article Full-Text PDF
190.02.18.18_effects_of_conservation_agriculture_on_crop_and_system_productivity_and_profitability_under_maize_based_system_in_far_western_nepal.pdf | |
File Size: | 1285 kb |
File Type: |
Article Metrics
Share This Article
|
|
Article Citations
MLA
Prasai et al. “Effects of conservation agriculture on crop and system productivity and profitability under maize based system in far western Nepal.” Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research 18(02) (2018): 1549-1568.
APA
Prasai, H. K. Sah, S. K. Gautam, A. K. and Regmi, A. P. (2018). Effects of conservation agriculture on crop and system productivity and profitability under maize based system in far western Nepal. Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research, 18(02), 1549-1568.
Chicago
Prasai, H. K. Sah, S. K. Gautam, A. K. and Regmi, A. P. “Effects of conservation agriculture on crop and system productivity and profitability under maize based system in far western Nepal.” Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research 18(02) (2018): 1549-1568.
Harvard
Prasai, H. K. Sah, S. K. Gautam, A. K. and Regmi, A. P. 2018. Effects of conservation agriculture on crop and system productivity and profitability under maize based system in far western Nepal. Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research, 18(02), pp. 1549-1568.
Vancouver
Prasai, HK, Sah, SK, Gautam, AK and Regmi, AP. Effects of conservation agriculture on crop and system productivity and profitability under maize based system in far western Nepal. Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research. 2018 December 18(02): 1549-1568.
Prasai et al. “Effects of conservation agriculture on crop and system productivity and profitability under maize based system in far western Nepal.” Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research 18(02) (2018): 1549-1568.
APA
Prasai, H. K. Sah, S. K. Gautam, A. K. and Regmi, A. P. (2018). Effects of conservation agriculture on crop and system productivity and profitability under maize based system in far western Nepal. Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research, 18(02), 1549-1568.
Chicago
Prasai, H. K. Sah, S. K. Gautam, A. K. and Regmi, A. P. “Effects of conservation agriculture on crop and system productivity and profitability under maize based system in far western Nepal.” Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research 18(02) (2018): 1549-1568.
Harvard
Prasai, H. K. Sah, S. K. Gautam, A. K. and Regmi, A. P. 2018. Effects of conservation agriculture on crop and system productivity and profitability under maize based system in far western Nepal. Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research, 18(02), pp. 1549-1568.
Vancouver
Prasai, HK, Sah, SK, Gautam, AK and Regmi, AP. Effects of conservation agriculture on crop and system productivity and profitability under maize based system in far western Nepal. Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research. 2018 December 18(02): 1549-1568.
References
- ABPSD (2014). Agro-Business Promotion and Statistics Division, Ministry of Agriculture Development, Singhdarbar, Kathmandu, Nepal. Statistical Information on Nepalese Agriculture.
- Baral, B. R. Adhikari, P. and J. Shrestha, J. (2016). Productivity and Economics of Hybrid Maize (Zea mays L.) under different Fertilizer Doses in the Inner Terai Region of Nepal. Journal of AgriSearch. 3(1), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.21921/jas.v3i1.11401
- Barron, J. Rockström, J. Gichuki, F. and Hatibu, N. (2003). Dry spell analysis and maize yields for two semi-arid locations in east Africa. Agricultural and forest meteorology, 117(1-2), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(03)00037-6
- Bashour, A. AI-Ouda, A. Kassam, A. Bachour, R. Jouni, K. Hansmann, B. and Estephan, C. (2016). An overview of conservation agriculture in the Dry Mediterranean environments with special focus in Syria and Lebanon. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 1(1), 67-84. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2016.1.67
- Carangal, V. R. Ali, S. M. Koble, A. F. Rinke, E. H. and Sentz, J. C. (1971). Comparison of S1 with testcross evaluation for recurrent selection in Maize 1. Crop science, 11(5), 658-661. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1971.0011183X001100050016x
- Chaudhary, M. Jat, HS. Datta, A. Yadav, A. K. Sapkota, T.B. Mondal, S. Meena, RP. Sharma, PC. And Jat M. L. (2018). Sustainable intensification influences soil quality biota and productivity I cereal based agro-ecosystem. Applied Soil Ecology, 126, 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.02.027
- Derpsch, R. Friedrich, T. Kassam, A. and Li, H. (2010). Current status of adoption of no-till farming in the world and some of its main benefits. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 3(1), 1-25.
- Erkossa, T. Stahr, K. and Gaiser, T. (2006). Soil tillage and crop productivity on a Vertisol in Ethiopian highlands. Soil and Tillage Research, 85(1-2), 200-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.01.009
- FAO. (2008). Investing in sustainable crop intensification: the case for improving soil health. International Technical Working Seminar, July 22-24, 2008, FAO, Rome
- FAO. (2010). Farming for the future of Southern Africa: An introduction to conservation agriculture. FAO Regional Engineering Office for South Africa. Technical Brief No. 1.
- Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. (1984). Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed. International Rice Research Institute, College, Laguna, p. 680.
- Haggblade, S. Kabwe, S. and Plerhoples, C. (2011). Productivity impact of conservation farming on smallholder cotton farmers in Zambia. Presented at: Conservation agriculture regional symposium for southern Africa, 8-10 February 2011, Johannesburg, South Africa. Abstract available from http://ecoport. org, In Michigan State University.
- Hobbs, P. R. (2007). Conservation agriculture: what is it and why is it important for future sustainable food production? Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 145(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859607006892
- Hobbs, P. R. Sayre, K. and Gupta, R. (2008). The role of conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 363(1491), 543-555. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2169
- Hossain, M. A. and Siddique, M. N. A. (2015). Water-A limiting resource for sustainable agriculture in Bangladesh. EC Agriculture, 1(2), 124-137.
- Ito, M. Matsumoto, T. and Quinones, M. A. (2007). Conservation tillage practice in sub-Saharan Africa: the experience of Sasakawa Global 2000. Crop protection, 26(3), 417-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2006.06.017
- Kassam, A. Friedrich, T. Shaxson, F. and Pretty, J. (2009). The spread of conservation agriculture: justification, sustainability and uptake. International journal of agricultural sustainability, 7(4), 292-320. https://doi.org/10.3763/ijas.2009.0477
- Lahmar, R. (2010). Adoption of conservation agriculture in Europe: lessons of the KASSA project. Land use policy, 27(1), 4-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.02.001
- Lobell, D. B. Burke, M. B. Tebaldi, C. Mastrandrea, M. D, Falcon, W. P. and Naylor, R. L. (2008). Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science, 319(5863), 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1152339
- Mazvimavi, K. (2011). Socio-economic analysis of conservation agriculture in southern Africa. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Regional Emergency Office for Southern Africa (REOSA), Johannesburg, South Africa. Network paper, 2.
- Mazvimavi, K. Ndlovu, P. V. An, H. and Murendo, C. (2012). Productivity and efficiency analysis of maize under conservation agriculture in Zimbabwe. In Selected Paper for Presentation at the International Conference for Agricultural Economists Triennial Conference.
- Montgomery, D. R. (2007). Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.104, 13268–13272. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611508104
- Pradhan, A. Idol, T. and Roul, P. K. (2016). Conservation agriculture practices in rainfed uplands of India improve maize-based system productivity and profitability. Frontiers in plant science, 7, 1008. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01008
- Prasai, H. K. Sah, S. K, Gautam, A. K. and Regmi, A. P. 2018. Conservation agriculture responses to productivity and profitability of mungbean under maize based cropping system in far western Nepal. Journal of Pure and Applied Agriculture, 3(1), 63-82.
- Prasai, H. K. Sharma, S. Kushwaha, U. J. S. Joshi, B. P. and Shrestha, J. (2016). Evaluation of grain legumes for yield and agronomic traits in far western hills of Nepal. Journals of Global Agriculture and Ecology, 4(1), 21-26
- Rusinamhodzi, L. Corbeels, M. Van Wijk, M. T, Rufino, M. C. Nyamangara, J. and Giller, K. E. (2011). A meta-analysis of long-term effects of conservation agriculture on maize grain yield under rain-fed conditions. Agronomy for sustainable development, 31(4), 657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0040-2
- Sanchez, P. A. (2002). Soil fertility and hunger. Africa. Science, 295(5562), 2019-2020. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1065256
- Sebastian, K. Fischer, G. and Nachtorgaele, F. (2010). Appropriate ecological zones: tropical warm sub humid, tropical warm arid agri-ecological zones in SSA. http:/dropper.org/data/map/aezoqssa.
- Shetto, R. and Owenya, M. (2007). Conservation agriculture as practised in Tanzania: Three case studies: Arumeru district, Karatu district, Mbeya district. ACT, FAO, CIRAD, RELMA.
- Shrestha, J. Yadav, D. N. Amgain, L. P. and Sharma, J. P. (2018). Effects of nitrogen and plant density on maize (Zea mays L.) phenology and grain yield. Current Agriculture Research Journal, 6(2), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.12944/CARJ.6.2.06
- Siddique, M. N. A. Sultana, J. and Abdullah, M. R. (2017). Aggregate stability: an indicator of quality and resistivity of arable Soil. Asian Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 1(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJSSPN/2017/34829
- Sultana, J. Siddique, M. N. A. and Abdullah, M. R. (2015). Fertilizer recommendation for agriculture: practice, practicalities and adaptation in Bangladesh and Netherlands. International Journal of Business, Management and Social Research, 1(1), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.18801/ijbmsr.010115.03
- Sultana, J. Siddique, M. N. A. Kamaruzzaman, M. and Halim, M. A. (2014). Conventional to Ecological: tea plantation soil management in Panchagarh district of Bangladesh. Journal of Science, Technology and Environment Informatics, 01(01), 27-35.
- Thomas, G. A. Titmarsh, G. W. Freebairn, D. M. and Radford, B. J. (2007). No-tillage and conservation farming practices in grain growing areas of Queensland–a review of 40 years of development. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 47(8), 887-898. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA06204
- Tshuma P. S. Mazvimous, K. Murando, C. Kunzekweguta, E. and Mutusvangwasammie (2010). Association of labor requirement in conservation agriculture in Zimbabwe. Paper presented for CA Regional Symposium, Johnnesburg.
- Wall, P. C. (2007). Tailoring conservation agriculture to the needs of small farmers in developing countries: an analysis of issues. Journal of crop improvement, 19(1-2), 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1300/J411v19n01_07
© 2018 The Authors. This article is freely available for anyone to read, share, download, print, permitted for unrestricted use and build upon, provided that the original author(s) and publisher are given due credit. All Published articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research EISSN 2312-7945.