J. Sci. Technol. Environ. Inform. | Volume 06, Issue 01, 458-465 | https://doi.org/10.18801/jstei.060118.48
Article type: Research article, Received: 10.07.2018, Revised: 29.10.2018, Date of Publication: 25 November 2018.
Article type: Research article, Received: 10.07.2018, Revised: 29.10.2018, Date of Publication: 25 November 2018.
Energy use pattern for rainfed and irrigated sorghum production in the Sudan
Abdelkarim D. Elfadil
Dept. of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Science, University of Gezira, Sudan.
Abstract
This study was conducted to compare the energy productivity of rainfed and irrigated sorghum in Sudan. Input data and yield were collected from the Agricultural Directorate records and The Mechanized rain farming Directorate. Results showed that total energy inputs of rainfed and irrigated sorghum were 1876.32 and 16469.35 MJ/ha, respectively. The total energy outputs were 108820 and 142000 MJ/ha, respectively. Based on these results, the energy use efficiency for rainfed and irrigated sorghum were 58.0 and 8.62, respectively. The energy productivity were 0.32 and 0.17 for rainfed and irrigated sorghum, respectively. The share of renewable energy of rainfed and irrigated sorghum were 15.20% for rainfed and 3.05% of the total input energy. Therefore, rainfed sorghum production is more efficient than irrigated sorghum. The study revealed that although the total energy output is high, only about 8% of it is grain and the rest is straw energy.
Key Words
Sorghum, Energy, Rainfed and Irrigated condition
Dept. of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Science, University of Gezira, Sudan.
Abstract
This study was conducted to compare the energy productivity of rainfed and irrigated sorghum in Sudan. Input data and yield were collected from the Agricultural Directorate records and The Mechanized rain farming Directorate. Results showed that total energy inputs of rainfed and irrigated sorghum were 1876.32 and 16469.35 MJ/ha, respectively. The total energy outputs were 108820 and 142000 MJ/ha, respectively. Based on these results, the energy use efficiency for rainfed and irrigated sorghum were 58.0 and 8.62, respectively. The energy productivity were 0.32 and 0.17 for rainfed and irrigated sorghum, respectively. The share of renewable energy of rainfed and irrigated sorghum were 15.20% for rainfed and 3.05% of the total input energy. Therefore, rainfed sorghum production is more efficient than irrigated sorghum. The study revealed that although the total energy output is high, only about 8% of it is grain and the rest is straw energy.
Key Words
Sorghum, Energy, Rainfed and Irrigated condition
Article Full-Text PDF
48.06.01.18_energy_use_pattern_for_rainfed_and_irrigated_sorghum_production_in_the_sudan.pdf | |
File Size: | 885 kb |
File Type: |
Share This Article
|
|
Article Citations
MLA
Elfadil, A. D. “Energy use pattern for rainfed and irrigated sorghum production in the Sudan”. Journal of Science, Technology and Environment Informatics 06(01) (2018): 458-465.
APA
Elfadil, A. D. (2018). Energy use pattern for rainfed and irrigated sorghum production in the Sudan. Journal of Science, Technology and Environment Informatics, 06(01), 458-465.
Chicago
Elfadil, A. D. “Energy use pattern for rainfed and irrigated sorghum production in the Sudan” Journal of Science, Technology and Environment Informatics 06 (01) (2018): 458-465.
Harvard
Elfadil, A. D. 2018. Energy use pattern for rainfed and irrigated sorghum production in the Sudan. Journal of Science, Technology and Environment Informatics, 06(01), pp. 458-465.
Vancouver
Elfadil, A. D. Energy use pattern for rainfed and irrigated sorghum production in the Sudan. Journal of Science, Technology and Environment Informatics. 2018 November 06(01): 458-465.
Elfadil, A. D. “Energy use pattern for rainfed and irrigated sorghum production in the Sudan”. Journal of Science, Technology and Environment Informatics 06(01) (2018): 458-465.
APA
Elfadil, A. D. (2018). Energy use pattern for rainfed and irrigated sorghum production in the Sudan. Journal of Science, Technology and Environment Informatics, 06(01), 458-465.
Chicago
Elfadil, A. D. “Energy use pattern for rainfed and irrigated sorghum production in the Sudan” Journal of Science, Technology and Environment Informatics 06 (01) (2018): 458-465.
Harvard
Elfadil, A. D. 2018. Energy use pattern for rainfed and irrigated sorghum production in the Sudan. Journal of Science, Technology and Environment Informatics, 06(01), pp. 458-465.
Vancouver
Elfadil, A. D. Energy use pattern for rainfed and irrigated sorghum production in the Sudan. Journal of Science, Technology and Environment Informatics. 2018 November 06(01): 458-465.
References
- Abbadi, K. A. and Ahmed, A. E. (2006). Brief overview of Sudan economy and future prospects for agricultural development. Khartoum Food Aid Forum, The World Food Programme (WFP).
- Acaroglu, M. and Aksoy, A. S. (2005). The cultivation and energy balance of Miscanthus giganteus production in Turkey. Biomass Bioenergy, 29, 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.01.002
- Alam, M. S., Alam, M. R. and Islam, K. K. (2005). Energy Flow in Agriculture: Bangladesh. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1(3), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2005.213.220
- Argiro, V., Strapatsa, A., George, D., Nanos, A. and Constantinos, A. (2006). Energy flow for integrated apple production in Greece. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 116, 176–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.02.003
- Canakci, M., Topakci, M., Akinci, I. and Ozmerzi, A. (2005). Energy use pattern of some field crops and vegetable production: case study for Antalya region, Turkey. Energy Convers Manage, 46, 65566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2004.04.008
- Erdal, G., Esengun, K., Erdal, H. and Gunduz, O. (2007). Energy use and economic analysis of sugar beet production in Tokat province of Turkey. Energy, 32, 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.01.007
- Esengun, K., Erdal, G., Gunduz, O. and Erdal, H. (2007). An economic analysis and energy use in stake-tomato production in Tokat province of Turkey. Renewable Energy, 32, 1873–1881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2006.07.005
- FAO/ SIFSIA (2010). Cereal availability study in the Northern states of Sudan. Khartoum, FAO. pp. 61.
- Gundogmus, E. (2006). Energy use on organic farming: a comparative analysis on organic versus conventional apricot production on smallholdings in Turkey. Energy Conversion and Management 47, 3351–3359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2006.01.001
- Guzman, G. I., Alonso, A. M. (2008). A comparison of energy use in conventional and organic olive oil production in Spain. Agricultural Systems, 98, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2008.06.004
- Hamdoun, M. A., Ageeb, A. O. and Dawelbeit, I. M. (1991). Review on Applied Research Sim ry land farming project, phase II. CIDA project No. 876/13234.
- Henry, R. J. and Kettlewell, P. S. (1996). Cereal Grain Quality. London: Chapman & Hall. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1513-8
- Hoeppner, J. W., Entz, M. H., McConkey, B. G., Zentner, R. P., Nagy, C. N. (2005). Energy use and efficiency in two Canadian organic and conventional crop production systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food System, 21, 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1079/RAF2005118
- Hossain, M. A. and Siddique, M. N. A. (2015). Water-A limiting resource for sustainable agriculture in Bangladesh. EC Agriculture, 1(2), 124-137.
- Institute for Security Studies (2005). “Sudan Economy Overview.” Knowledge empowers Africa. Retrieved 22/03/2013 from http://www.issafrica.org/.
- Karkacier, O., GokalpGoktolga, Z. and Cicek, A. (2006). A regression analysis of the effect of energy use in agriculture. Energy Policy, 34(18), 3796-3800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.09.001
- Kizilaslan, H. (2008). Input-output energy analysis of cherries production in Tokat Province of Turkey. Applied Energy, In Press, Corrected Proof.
- Ozkan, B., Akcaoz, H. and Fert, C. (2004). Energy input–output analysis in Turkish agriculture. Renewable Energy, 29, 2939–2951.
- Pimentel, D. (1980). Handbook of Energy Utilization in Agriculture. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
- Pimentel, D. and Pimentel, M. (2008). Food, energy and society (3rd ed.). Boca Raton FL: CRC Press.
- Pimentel, D., Berardi, G., Fast, S. (1983). Energy efficiency of farming systems: organic and conventional agriculture. Agricultural and Ecosystems Environment 9, 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(83)90021-X
- Sauerbeck, D. R. (2001). CO2 emissions and C sequestration by agriculture – perspectives and limitations. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 60, 253-266. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012617516477
- Shahan, S., Jafari, A., Mobli, H., Rafiee, S. and Karimi, M. (2008). Energy use and economic analysis of wheat production in Iran: A case study from Ardabil province. Journal of Agricultural Technology, 4(1), 77-88.
- Ahmed, S. (2007). FAO/WFP crop and food supply assessment mission to Sudan special report. Rome, FAO.
- Singh, H., Mishra, D. and Nahar, N. M. (2002). Energy use pattern in production agriculture of a typical village in Arid Zone India-Part I. Energ Convers Manag. 43(16), 2275–2286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(01)00161-3
- Singh, J. M. (2002). On farm energy use pattern in different cropping systems in Haryana, India. Master of Science. Germany: International Institute of Management, University of Flensburg.
- Singh, S. and Mittal, J. P. (1992). Energy in production Agriculture. Mittal Publications, New Delhi.
- Stout, B. A. (1990). Handbook of energy for world agriculture. London; New York: Elsevier Science Pub. Co. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0745-4
- Sultana, J., Siddique, M. N. A. and Abdullah, M. R. (2015). Fertilizer recommendation for agriculture: practice, practicalities and adaptation in Bangladesh and Netherlands. International Journal of Business, Management and Social Research, 1(1), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.18801/ijbmsr.010115.03
- Uhlin, H. (1998). Why energy productivity is increasing: an I–O analysis of Swedish agriculture. Agric Syst. 56(4), 443–65.
- UNEP (2007). Sudan post-conflict environmental assessment. Nairobi, United Nations Environment Program. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(97)00059-0
- Yilmaz, I., Akcaoz, H. and Ozkan, B. (2005). An analysis of energy use and input costs for cotton production in Turkey. Renewable Energy. 30, 145–155.
- Ziesemer, J. (2007). Energy use in organic food systems. Rome: Natura Resources Management and Environment Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2004.06.001
© 2018 The Authors. This article is freely available for anyone to read, share, download, print, permitted for unrestricted use and build upon, provided that the original author(s) and publisher are given due credit. All Published articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal of Science, Technology and Environment Informatics, EISSN 2409-7632.