Journal of Science, Technology and Environment Informatics |
|
RESEARCH ARTICLE:
Comparative performance evaluation of DP 480 model and ARP-4UM rice transplanter
Kaniz Tamanna, A. N. M. Arifur Rahman and Md. Ashik-E-Rabbani
Dept. of Farm Power and Machinery, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh
Article info.
Received: 25.03.17, Revised: 09.05.17, Second Date of Publication (Version 2): 14 February 2018.
J. Sci. Technol. Environ. Inform. | Volume 05, Issue 02, pp. 413-420
Crossref: https://doi.org/10.18801/jstei.050218.44
Comparative performance evaluation of DP 480 model and ARP-4UM rice transplanter
Kaniz Tamanna, A. N. M. Arifur Rahman and Md. Ashik-E-Rabbani
Dept. of Farm Power and Machinery, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh
Article info.
Received: 25.03.17, Revised: 09.05.17, Second Date of Publication (Version 2): 14 February 2018.
J. Sci. Technol. Environ. Inform. | Volume 05, Issue 02, pp. 413-420
Crossref: https://doi.org/10.18801/jstei.050218.44
FULL TEXT PDF:

44.17.5.2_v.2_comparative_performance_evaluation_of_dp_480_model_and_arp-4um_rice_transplanter.pdf | |
File Size: | 933 kb |
File Type: |
-
Abstract
-
Citations
-
References
<
>
Title: Comparative performance evaluation of DP 480 model and ARP-4UM rice transplanter
Abstract: Two types of rice transplanter model were hired to conduct the experiment at Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU), Mymensingh in May-June, 2014 for Aman season to evaluate their comparative performances. Both the transplanters were tested in the departmental laboratory and in the field. During off-field test on concrete, the seedling per hill at high, medium and low position of seedling density controller was found 7, 5 and 4 in ARP-4UM model and it was14.3%, 20%, and 50% less in the DP 480 model compared to ARP-4UM model. During in field test the seedling per hill at high position of seedling density controller was found to be same in ARP-4UM model and DP 480 model but for medium and low position the seedling per hill was 6,3 and 1 in DP 480 model which was 25% and 50% more in ARP-4UM compared to DP 480 model. After the experiment, the transplanting depth for shallow, standard and deeper position of depth controller was found 2.39, 3.89 and 6.42 in DP 480 model and it was 10.3%, 6.9% and 30.99% less in ARP-4UM. On an average the percent of skidding was found 12.3% in DP 480 model and 16.2% in ARP-4UM model at the 15cm prefixed position of the plant to plant distance controller. Percent of missing hill in 120cm×200cm was found 4.35% in ARP-4UM model and 2.18% in DP 480 model. The field capacity was found 0.2052 ha/hr in DP 480 model and 0.1801 ha/hr in ARP-4UM model. The amount of Fuel consumed in ARP-4UM Model was obtained 1.43 lit/ha and in DP 480 Model rice transplanter it was 1.57 lit/ha. After calculating all the parameters related to the performance of the rice transplanter it was found that the DP 480 model was better compared to the ARP-4UM model in terms of break-even analysis.
Key Words: Rice transplanter, Seedling raising, Field capacity, Fuel consumption and Break-even point
Abstract: Two types of rice transplanter model were hired to conduct the experiment at Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU), Mymensingh in May-June, 2014 for Aman season to evaluate their comparative performances. Both the transplanters were tested in the departmental laboratory and in the field. During off-field test on concrete, the seedling per hill at high, medium and low position of seedling density controller was found 7, 5 and 4 in ARP-4UM model and it was14.3%, 20%, and 50% less in the DP 480 model compared to ARP-4UM model. During in field test the seedling per hill at high position of seedling density controller was found to be same in ARP-4UM model and DP 480 model but for medium and low position the seedling per hill was 6,3 and 1 in DP 480 model which was 25% and 50% more in ARP-4UM compared to DP 480 model. After the experiment, the transplanting depth for shallow, standard and deeper position of depth controller was found 2.39, 3.89 and 6.42 in DP 480 model and it was 10.3%, 6.9% and 30.99% less in ARP-4UM. On an average the percent of skidding was found 12.3% in DP 480 model and 16.2% in ARP-4UM model at the 15cm prefixed position of the plant to plant distance controller. Percent of missing hill in 120cm×200cm was found 4.35% in ARP-4UM model and 2.18% in DP 480 model. The field capacity was found 0.2052 ha/hr in DP 480 model and 0.1801 ha/hr in ARP-4UM model. The amount of Fuel consumed in ARP-4UM Model was obtained 1.43 lit/ha and in DP 480 Model rice transplanter it was 1.57 lit/ha. After calculating all the parameters related to the performance of the rice transplanter it was found that the DP 480 model was better compared to the ARP-4UM model in terms of break-even analysis.
Key Words: Rice transplanter, Seedling raising, Field capacity, Fuel consumption and Break-even point
HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE
APA (American Psychological Association)
Tamanna, K., Rahman, A. N. M. A. and Rabbani, M. A. (2018). Comparative performance evaluation of DP 480 model and ARP-4UM rice transplanter. Journal of Science, Technology and Environment Informatics, 05(02), 413-420.
MLA (Modern Language Association)
Tamanna, K., Rahman, A. N. M. A. and Rabbani, M. A. . "Comparative performance evaluation of DP 480 model and ARP-4UM rice transplanter." Journal of Science, Technology and Environment Informatics, 05.02 (2018): 413-420.
Chicago and or Turabian
Tamanna, K., Rahman, A. N. M. A. and Rabbani, M. A. "Comparative performance evaluation of DP 480 model and ARP-4UM rice transplanter." Journal of Science, Technology and Environment Informatics, 05. no. 02 (2018): 413-420.
APA (American Psychological Association)
Tamanna, K., Rahman, A. N. M. A. and Rabbani, M. A. (2018). Comparative performance evaluation of DP 480 model and ARP-4UM rice transplanter. Journal of Science, Technology and Environment Informatics, 05(02), 413-420.
MLA (Modern Language Association)
Tamanna, K., Rahman, A. N. M. A. and Rabbani, M. A. . "Comparative performance evaluation of DP 480 model and ARP-4UM rice transplanter." Journal of Science, Technology and Environment Informatics, 05.02 (2018): 413-420.
Chicago and or Turabian
Tamanna, K., Rahman, A. N. M. A. and Rabbani, M. A. "Comparative performance evaluation of DP 480 model and ARP-4UM rice transplanter." Journal of Science, Technology and Environment Informatics, 05. no. 02 (2018): 413-420.
- Ganapathi, D. and Kumar, S. A. (2015). Design, development and field evaluation of manually operated rice transplanter for system of rice intensification. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, 8(3), 735-741. https://doi.org/10.5958/2230-732X.2015.00081.9
- Grain report (2017). Bangladesh grain and feed update. Global Agricultural Information Network. http://www.world-grain.com/articles/news_home/World_Grain_News/2017
- Hunt, D. (1995). Farm Power and Machinery Management, Cost Determination, 9th edition, Iowa State University Press, USA.
- Islam, A. K. M. S. and Rahman, M. A. (2014). BRRI-Syngenta Tegra transplanting under public private partnership approach. An unpublished research report submitted to Tegra program, Syngenta Bangladesh Limited.
- Munnaf, M. A. (2013). Performance evaluation of KUKJE self-propelled rice transplanter. Dept. of Farm Power and Machinery, BAU, Mymensingh.
- Rahman, M. R. (1997). Pesticides use and its impact on MV rice productivity and farmer’s health. M.S. Thesis. Department of Agricultural Economics, BSMRAU, Salna, Gazipur.
- Singh, G., Sharma, T. R. and Bockhop, C. W. (1985). Field performance evaluation of a manual rice transplanter. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 32, 259-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8634(85)90083-6
Open Access | Read Article
© 2018 The Authors. This article published by Journal BiNET is freely available for anyone to read, share, download, print, permitted for unrestricted use and build upon, provided that the original author(s) and publisher are given due credit. All Published articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.